Since my experiences of last week,
with medical practices prevalent in Singapore, I have been pondering
about about one particular aspect of this modern way in which
interaction between the medical profession and the patients or their
near ones is carried out. I have briefly mentioned about one
particular conversation in my earlier
article, but would rather repeat it here for
the sake of continuance of my thoughts.
After admitting a person in the
emergency ward of an hospital because of acute abdominal and chest
pain due to a fall on ground from vertical standing position, we were
patiently and anxiously waiting for more than 2 hours in the Hospital
veranda. Meanwhile the patient did undergo X-ray scan, ultrasound
scan and even CT scan. As we found out later, results of all these
tests showed no abnormality of any kind. Even then, our first
interaction with a staff member of the hospital, managed to intensify
our anxiety instead of being smoothing it out. We were then told that
the fall could have damaged the bladder or kidneys because there were
traces of blood in the urine. Kidneys could have been damaged
permanently and she might need dialysis is future. Because ultrasound
tests showed presence of some fluid in the abdomen, we were told that
there is a possibility that bladder might have ruptured or because of
rupturing of some veins, there might have been some internal
bleeding, which might need operating upon etc. etc.
I am aware that all these medical
possibilities certainly were possible. But the point which I am
trying to raise is whether it was really necessary to point out to
all the negative possibilities at that point of time? Wouldn't it
have been better to say that all tests are negative but because of
blood traces in urine and presence of fluid in abdomen, further
investigations or keeping her for observation is needed. I am told
that this trend of narrating worst case scenarios has its origin in
USA, because of the possibility of lawsuits by the patients for not
providing accurate information to them by the hospitals. Slowly, it
has spread all over western world and some other countries like
Singapore and Malaysia.
I fondly remember our old family doctor
in India, who treated all of us in the family, from ages of 4 or 5 to
84 or 85. Whenever we approached him with a complaint, his first
reaction used to be absolutely casual as if falling sick is something
very routine. He would just brush off any deeper or sinister
possibilities. My father had a stroke, when he was about 70 years
old. Those were the days when Doctors would make a home visit if
illness was serious. A specialist Physician was contacted and he made
a visit to our home. After examining my father, his entire body
language and words were so encouraging and supportive, that my
father, who till that moment, was not even able to lift his finger,
was able to pick up a rubber ball and grab and press it slightly.
Such is the magic power of a physician's words and body language.
I am not at all for keeping the patient
and his/her near ones in ignorance, as was the practice earlier. They
must be informed about the ailment fully and the treatment that is
given. But shouldn’t the physician, through his body language and
speech offer a ray of hope to the suffering. Why should he/she or
near ones be told about the worst case scenario possible even before
treatment has began. Medical science has progressed by leaps and
bounds. The diagnosis these days, is made on basis of many tests. But
what is lacking, is the Doctor's moral boosting support, which
according to me is most critical for any quick recovery. Specialist
Doctors these days have become Robots dishing out pessimism instead
of optimism.
I somehow feel that the old system of
family Doctors and home visits, was much better for the patients and
their recovery. Modern medical practice has become just another
business avenue to earn money for the investors. A visit to a Doctor
no longer remains something that would console and boost moral of a
patient but a mere business transaction.
14 June 2013
In USA, if the doctor did not tell everything including possibilities he or she may get sued later for concealing necessary information.
ReplyDeleteMy friend tells me a story of a 12 year old boy, who obviously ate too much and had indigestion, and some constipation, and he would be cured within a short time with maybe some common medicine. But the doctor was required to tell that it could be a sign of heart trouble theoretically speaking, but he does not think so. However if the boy's parents want they can take him for further investigation from a specialist. If the doctor had not told this, he would likely be sued.
I am disgusted with the USA system in which doctors are just puppets and have not much say in how to treat patients. It's just insurance and lawyers dictate what needs to be done!
you talk of family doctor where are families everybody is looking after hiself.
ReplyDeletewhere are families while you talk of family doctor. everybody is looking after himself
ReplyDeleteashok
ReplyDeleteThere may not be large families like past, but still there are nuclear families that do need healthcare.