If
there is anything that I am greatly scared off, is making an attempt
to catch a running train just arriving or departing from a railway
station. Sometime in 1970's, when I was a young man, I had two narrow
escapes. One of this happened on one morning, when I tried to get
inside a train that was arriving in Pune railway station but still
moving. I had caught the handle provided near the door but before I
could step in, my hand slipped and I fell on the platform. I had a
briefcase in my hand, which perhaps saved me as I did not slip down
in the gap between the platform and the moving train and just escaped
with a few bruises on my elbow and a leg.
The
second incident happened at Mumbai's Churchgate suburban station. I
was trying to catch a local train arriving in the station, that was
crammed with people, who wanted to get out. As I tried to get in, I
was pushed out by the pressure of commuters trying to get out. I fell
down and luckily was saved again as I was neither stampeded with a
rush of great many people trying to move out, nor slipped into the
gap between the train and the platform. After these two horrifying
incidents, I decided once and for all that getting a seat in the
train was not worth my life and have always waited for the train to
arrive at a complete halt.
Sometimes
it can be still a tricky affair to get inside a train even when the
train is dead stopped, because there is always a wide gap between the
train and the platform. This gap can create problems particularly for
small children and aged. On most of the long distance trains in
India, the door in a railway coach is at a higher level than the
platform and one needs to climb two or three steps to get inside.
This makes getting inside a train even more difficult for aged and
who have some physical disability. Compared to this, suburban trains
have coaches, where one can enter a coach by just stepping in, as
platform and coaches are more or less at the same level. But the
dreaded platform gap is present here too. I have seen pictures, where
a movable step is placed on this gap to facilitate entry inside a
coach. But I have not seen anything similar in practice.
Singapore's
MRT or metro is one of the safest train systems for the commuters.
There are gates provided on the platform, which do not open unless
the train comes to a complete halt making it impossible to catch a
moving train. The platform height is so carefully adjusted that even
a small child can just walk through with least discomfort to enter
the train. In spite of all these safety measures, there are still
accidents on Singapore's MRT; the most common reason for these
accidents is again the gap between the coach and the platform. To
make you aware for this common cause of accidents, MRT management
keeps on announcing, every time a train arrives in any of the
stations with a clear warning “ Please mind the gap.” A warning
that is given almost by all metro operators in the world and was
first introduced in 1969 on the London Underground in the United
Kingdom.
I was
under impression so far that this platform gap is of importance only
for the safety of railway commuters. I find now that I have been
wrong all along and this platform gap is of crucial importance for
the railway company itself too and if this gap is not maintained
properly, it might have to take huge financial hit to take corrective
measures.
About
17 years ago, French national railways were divided in two companies.
French railway network is now owned by Réseau Ferré de France or
RFF, whereas the trains are operated by Société Nationale des
Chemins de Fer or SNCF. The railway stations, tracks, signaling is
all looked after by RFF, whereas whatever moves on the tracks or the
rolling stock, is acquired, maintained and operated by SNCF.
Purchase orders was placed by SNCF in 2009 and 2010 for a total cost
of €3 billion, for new trains with Alstom SA and Bombardier Inc.
The trains were supposed to have a wide body for more passenger
comfort.
The
first of coaches, that were ordered 4 years ago, has arrived in
France. However the coaches are now so wide that the trains can not
enter a station at all as the gap between the platform and the coach
has now become negative or in other words, the coaches would hit the
platform if the train is brought inside a station. The only solution
now is that about 1,300 of France's 8,700 railway platforms will have
to be trimmed to make way for the wider rolling stock at a whooping
cost of about €50 million or US$68.5 million. The work would have
to be completed by 2016, as the trains would be delivered by then.
There
is widespread criticism in France of the railway companies, though
some blame the fact that the blunder has happened because the track
operator in French Railway system has been separated from the train
operator. The two companies now say that they will publish a report
next week detailing how the error was made and when it became
apparent the platforms would have to be altered.
French
Environment and Energy Minister Ségolène Royal says she would want
to know how such a stupid decision had been made. And adds: "Such
implausible errors simply go to show there are people in Parisian
offices who are too far removed from the regional reality,"
Marine Le Pen, leader of the far-right National Front said the
episode is "an inexcusable waste of public money."
How
curious? No wonder that the platform gap is a real curse for
everyone, the commuter as well as the railway companies.
23rd
May 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment