I have
been a member of a private club situated in my home town Pune. This
club is quite old and was started by some British army officers
posted in the cantonment, in the vicinity of the old city. Slowly,
Indians were admitted to the club and after 1947, when the British
army officers left India, our club became a club totally owned by
Indians. Our club still maintains some old traditions. It does not
allow members wearing shorts, Tee shirts or footwear like sandals or
flip flops, to enter the dining room. Some members resent this and
feel that more casual attire should be allowed inside. In spite of
this resentment, majority of the members feel that the present dress
code is a good thing and is continued.
I also
happen to be a member of an another club in Pune, which is sports
devoted. The major activities that happen on club premises are mostly
related to indoor and outdoor sports, The club also has a dining
area. There are absolutely no dress restrictions here. You can walk
in the dining area after a game of tennis, still dressed in a Tee and
shorts and no one seems to object.
The
point I am trying to make is that each and every organization has its
rules, conventions and traditions. It would be totally wrong to say
that an 'A' club is right or 'B' club is wrong because one allows
something and the other does not. Recently in the assembly of Tamil
Nadu state of India, an attempt was made to classify some do's as wrongs and
some don'ts as rights for a club in Chennai, by Councillors, who are gross outsiders and who
have nothing to do with that club. It naturallyr become a matter of great debate.
This happened because of a little incident that happened a few days
ago and the controversy it seems to have generated.
Tamil
Nadu Cricket Association Club or TNCA Club, Chennai was founded in
the year 2000 and is run by the members only for the members. As is
the practice of most of the clubs in India, TNCA also allows its
members to arrange small get-togethers or other functions on its
premises, when outsiders are allowed to enter club premises. A few
days back, a book release function was arranged at TNCA club, when
Madras high court judge Justice D Hariparanthaman, and two senior
advocates, R Gandhi and G R Swaminathan, were invited to attend this
function. However, when these three eminent persons reached the TNCA
club, they were denied entry in the club , simply because all three
of them wear waring Dhotis.
TNCA
club dress regulation stipulates: "Persons will not be admitted
into the club premises if they are not decently dressed. Persons
attired in coloured bermudas, colour/multi-colour lungies, cut
banians/vests and/or wearing hawai chappals will onto be permitted
into the TNCA club." The club staff denied permission to these
three luminaries saying that wearing dhoti was "violation of
club's dress code." It seems than other clubs in Chennai like
the Boat Club, Madras Gymkhana Club also follow similar practices.
It
must be however remembered that Dhoti is not an attire that can be
classified along with bermudas and lungies. It is the traditional
Tamil wear, worn on formal as well as religious occasions like
marriages or even visits to temples. India's former finance minister
used to wear it even in the parliament.
It was
no wonder therefore that this incident caused a furor in Tamil Nadu
and many felt that this was returning to the days of British
colonialism. Tamil Nadu's chief minister dubbed the act as "sartorial
despotism." Condemning the incident, she said that the club's
act was a mockery of Tamil culture and tradition. These practices
were in vogue during the colonial rulers. It is regrettable that
these acts continue despite sending the British off 67 years ago.
Tamil
Nadu Government wants to enact new legislation now to put an end to
the practice of denying entry to dhoti-clad people into clubs in the
state and take action against the club through the Registrar of
Societies by issuing a show cause notice seeking a reply from the
club. The reason for the show cause notice is that the club bye-laws
submitted by the TNCA to the Registrar of Societies have no mention
of the dhoti as a banned attire.
I
would consider these likely steps to be undertaken by the Tamil Nadu
Government as carrying things too far. The Government may be right in
asking the club about denial of the entry for a person wearing a
Dhoti, when it's bye-laws do not specify this attire as a banned one.
But if tomorrow the clubs amend their bye-laws and insert the words
Dhoti also, what could it possibly do? After all, these clubs are
private clubs run by the members and framing rules and bye-laws is
their own sweet prerogative.
I have a few small questions for the Madras high court judge and the two senior advocates. They know that legal courts in India, have rules about the attire and the ware the judges and advocates are supposed to wear. Would these distinguished gentlemen, attend the courts in tee shirts and jeans? Surely not! Similarly if some private club, like most of the clubs in India, has a dress code? Why did they went to a club wearing a Dhoti? Did they not know that they would not be allowed? I have nothing against Dhoti as a formal attire. But I do not understand this insistence on wearing it in a club.
17th
July 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment