There
are many things that make humans mark out from other large mammals
that exist in the world. One of these is a unique ability to decide,
how they should spend the time of their lives. Other mammals also
spend their lives in a well regulated environment, but it so happens
that their lives are totally regulated by someone else; the nature.
The nature has programmed each and every aspect of their life
minutely so a ferocious cat would not not even look towards a pray,
if not hungry. They procreate only at a certain time specified by
nature. Beasts have very little power over their actions and seem to
follow nature's diktats all the time. Only in case of humans, nature
has not done any programming at all and has left it entirely to the
human brains.
Sometimes,
humans do not use their brain and overdo things, like eating even
when not angry, but by and large, human brain controls the mind so
that the body behaves in an orderly fashion. We can therefore see a
normal rational human spending all of his lifetime in a well
coordinated and regulated fashion. There are some exceptions, who
utterly disregard, what their brain tells them, but they mostly pay
the price for it in acquiring some form of dysfunctional disability
making their life unbearable or even in form of untimely death.
When
we talk of humans living together in a society, which could be in any
form like a family, a residential colony, a village, a city, a state
or even a nation, it is obvious that the members of this society
would need to regulate their lives in such fashion that they do not
cause interference in lives of other members of the society. If every
member of this society starts deciding, how he and every other
individual member of such a society should behave, the result is
likely to be a clash between the members and complete chaos.
Experience of thousand of human generations have taught us that
collective wisdom of the members of the society to set up norms of
behaviour for the individual members of the society, is the only
practical solution of the problem.
Such
norms of behaviour formed by collective wisdom are generally known as
rules and regulations of a society and these are implemented or put
in force on the basis of what are called as Laws, which may also
stipulate deterrent punishments in case a member decides to break the
rules. In the ancient and medieval periods the laws were made by the
king and his advisers, that is why reign of some kings was considered
as beneficial and some kings are known as tyrants. In modern
societies, the laws and subsequent rules and regulations are formed
and approved by legislative bodies, whose members are usually elected
by the ordinary members of that society or state.
If we
have a look at the Indian history, we can see that till British
conquered India, individual states ruled by kings, formed their own
laws, mostly on the whims of the kings. The Mughal empire, ruling
over a large area in northern India, did have strict laws, though in
many cases totally unjustifiable as they were based on laws of a
particular religion. It was only towards end of British rule, that
India saw modern uniform laws formed with proper channels for
grievance redressal mechanisms in form of a judicial system.
After
India became independent, it carried forward the legacy of most of
the British laws and kept adding hundreds of laws, rules and
regulations, to meet new situations and challenges effectively. India
is a union of individual member state Governments and has a federal
structure with a federal Government in place. Indians elect state and
federal Governments by electing representatives, who also constitute
a legislative law making body.
How
many laws, rules and regulations are in existence in India? I do not
think that anyone would be able to answer that question correctly.
India has 29 states and 7 union territories, all of which, along with
a federal legislative body, have powers to pass legislation in form
of laws, based on which the Governments can form rules and
regulations. Even many of the laws, rules and regulations, formed by
British Raj, are still in force in India. Readers can well
appreciate, why it is quite difficult to arrive at correct number of
laws that are in force in India.
Would
you believe that we still have on our statute books, laws that
pertain to manage issues arising out of the Partition of India, that
happened in 1947 or outdated laws relating to former princely states
and the nationalisation
of industries and banks. Recently I came across a publication named
as “The 100 Laws Project” by a group based in Delhi and who
describe themselves as a civil group. They say that they have taken
up this project in association with Centre
for Civil Society's iJustice, NIPFP Macro/Finance Group, and Vidhi
Legal Centre. With the help of lawyers, legislative experts and
economists they have managed to collect a list of 100 such archaic
laws that need immediate scrapping.
I
found the list of laws quiet interesting as it shows the thinking
processes of the successive Governments starting from the British Raj
itself. In this report, the laws have been classified systematically,
under following heads and make interesting reading.
Archaic
British Era Laws
Obsolete
Partition and Post-Independence Reorganisation
Unnecessary
Levies and Taxes
Redundant
Nationalisation
Outmoded
Labour Relations
Restrictive
Business and Economic Regulations
Ineffective
Governance and Administration
Obstructive
Civil and Personal Interference
The
new Government, formed this year, has already announced to their
intention to scrap such archaic laws. This report is likely to be a
great help in that direction.
13th
October 2014
अशाच कायद्याना नजरेसमोर ठेवून पंतप्रधान नरेंद्र मोदींनी नुकतेच अमेरिकेतील भारतीयांना संबोधित करतांना असे जुने कालबाह्य झालेले कायदे त्यांचे सरकार लवकरच एकेक करून मोडीत काढणार असल्याचे (रद्द करणार) सूचित केले आहे, व ते अगदी उचित आहे असे मला वाटते.
ReplyDelete