After
I completed my graduation year in Engineering, I did a short training
stint in an organization that was called as “Electronics and Radar
Developement Establishment (LRDE). This organization was under the
umbrella of “Defence Research and Development Organization,” a
behemoth that has today under it, 52 laboratories, five defence
PSUs, four shipyards and 39 ordnance factories. 7800 scientists work
with DRDO at present. I was quite thrilled at having received an
opportunity to work in such an organization ( albeit for few weeks
only.)
My
first few days went through appreciating the laboratory, its
equipments, projects in hand and in general friendly atmosphere.
However after spending a couple of weeks, my enthusiasm turned into
disapointment for having selected this place for my training. It became
obvious to me that I had no chance of learning anything there, that
might help me in my future, because either very little actual work was being
done in the organization or I was purposely kept away from it. The junior engineering staff did few things
but there was no proper guidance from the managers, who spent most of
the time in meetings, where only God knows what they discussed.
Perhaps they discussed about budgets, new equipment purchases,
additional staff requirement (for what purpose?) and getting
themselves delegated to some or other conferences or seminars.
Later,
when I was in charge of a section in an R&D organization in one
of India's private sector conglomerates, I had another chance to rub
shoulders with an ex-DRDO engineer. He was sent to me to by the management to augment our
section. I was naturally quite happy with that. The new engineer came
from a DRDO laboratory, where he held a senior position. However I
soon realised that the gentleman ( he was an extremely nice person),
had very little knowledge of electronics circuit design that was our bread and
butter. He survived in our section for about an year and went back to
his laboratory cursing the ever demanding private sector.
I agree that these two short exposure experiences at a very low level of the management, may not mean much. But, perhaps they are indicative of the deeper malignancy that is making this Government owned behemoth a colossal waste of
missed opportunities, money, manpower and a drain on the
exchequer.
Let us
have a look at things in which DRDO is involved today. DRDO has 530
on-going R&D projects worth Rs 48 Billions with 136 of them in
mission mode. It makes everything from mosquito repellents to Nuclear
missiles. Current production order for systems developed by DRDO are
worth Rupees 169 Billion. DRDO's annual budget is Rupees 15 Billion.
The
major problem with DRDO is that none of its projects or programmes
run on schedules. The most important ten major projects run by DRDO
are all delayed due to some reason or other. These projects include
the LCA Tejas aircraft, Naval Light Combat Aircraft, Aero Engine
Kaveri, Airborne Early Warning and Control Aircraft and Long Range
Surface-to-Air Missile besides several key missile programmes. There
is a general apprehension that the projects are delayed because of
paucity of funds is not exactly true.
Just
compare DRDO with ISRO, another Government owned giant, which has an
annual budget of Rupees 6.8 Billions and around 20 facilities all
over country. ISRO has come out with gem after gem like Lunar
Orbiter, Mars orbiter, more than 100 rocket launchings and scores of
satellites including an Indian GPS system. It has recently tested a 4
tonne capability rocket.
It is
a million dollar question that when ISRO can achieve such glorious
successes, why not DRDO? The main problem according to me, is the
basic relaxed work culture of DRDO. They set up targets but do not
fire people or take action against them, if these are not met. They
function more like a Government office and not like a cutting edge
R&D organization working for specific goals to be completed on
schedule.
Look
at the fate of some of the major DRDO projects. The project to
develop and manufacture main battle tank for Army named as “ Arjun”
was launched in 1974. Army has been dissatisfied and unhappy with
its performance. After great pressure from Government, it has
reluctantly inducted 124 tanks. Army desires to have a better version
called as Mark II with 89 upgrades. This is still being tested.
The
light combat aircraft “Tejas” was sanctioned in 1983 at cost of
Rs. 5.6 Billion. The revised development cost has now become Rs.
17.27 Billion. Final operational clearence still not received,
Improved Mark II version under development, to be available in
2021-22. Each aircraft will cost Rs. 2.2 Billion.
It has
almost become a general rule that all DRDO projects suffer from huge
costs and time overruns. This has effected and hurt India's defence
procurement policy so badly that the country still has to import over
65% of its military requirements from abroad.
Government
has been trying to improve working of DRDO for quite some time. A
committee was appointed in 2008 known as Rama Rao Committee (RRC),
who made certain recommendations, but Government did not take any
steps. It is a writing on the wall that a drastic overhaul is needed
to boost the sluggish performance of DRDO, as the country cannot keep
importing its defence stores permanently and remain
strategically-vulnerable.
The
first signs of new Government's unhappiness came, when prime minister
warned DRDO in his speech during DRDO Awards 2013 function in New
Delhi, in August 2014. He had said and I quote:
“ India
does not lack the requisite scientific talent and capability but this
"chalta hai" attitude (lackadaisical) has put paid to all
endeavours. The world will not wait for us. We have to run ahead of
time. We should not say in 2014 that a project conceived in 1992 will
take some more time. With defence technology evolving at a rapid rate
around the globe, India cannot afford to conceptualize systems that
are two steps behind what will soon hit the market. ” The prime
minister also suggested that at least five of its labs should be
headed by scientists under the age of 35.
However
even after 5 months since that warning, DRDO gave no signs of
awakening to the new realities as no young scientist was appointed
as a lab head and eight or nine of the top 14 top scientists were
already on extension past retirement. It was clear that they needed
a slap or even better, a kick in the butt. That much needed treatment
came this week, when the Government unceremoniously sacked DRDO
chief Avinash Chander. In fact, so stern and shocking was the
dismissal that the chief came to know about it when media informed
him that he had been dismissed with effect from January 31.
The
whole DRDO fraternity, enjoying quiet slumber under bureaucratic
shield and secretness is shocked to the core and there are raised
eyebrows and mild murmurs. There is no doubt that a shock treatment
was required to move them from deep slumber of contentedness. It is
hoped that this shock treatment would have some effect on this
behemoth.
17th
January 2014
p.s.
Time of India reports on 17th January 2014 that in a quiet ceremony, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) handed over the Tejas Series Production-1 (LCA-SP1) to defence minister and Air chief marshal.in Bengaluru.
p.s.
Time of India reports on 17th January 2014 that in a quiet ceremony, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) handed over the Tejas Series Production-1 (LCA-SP1) to defence minister and Air chief marshal.in Bengaluru.
Well depends. Experience is that LRDE has many programs in production today. So they are doing something right. The person you interacted with is possibly one of the transfers from other labs to LRDE who is unfamiliar with electronics. They have a process in place where people who have worked on completely different technologies or arenas or mechanical can move to different fields or labs for exposure. Some consultant recommended this for cross functional diversity. Its a hit or a miss depending on your belief system. Some people may adapt, others may wonder what they are in for.
ReplyDeleteNow I dont know which era you worked in with LRDE but its a fact that till the 80's, it was just biding time with no real programs or progress. Past decade is a different story. They have many products and orders.
About the programs you have mentioned, don't go by mere public recounts of dates and timeframes. Both programs have a lot of details that are not generally in public glare. Arjun is perfect example of acquisition malpractice. Army has asked for 89 improvements to a tank which are not there in its Russian rival at all. Its a perfect example of endless trials, zero accountability and giving a bad name to a program (Arjun) and also diverting public attention. If in history of independent India audit is done of scams, then T-90 scam will rank as #1.
ISRO comparison is meaningless as ISRO is the father and mother of its programs. It decides it procures. Who is there to say otherwise?
Tejas program is another which has suffered from not just DRDO mismanagement, but also user disinterest who is interested in fancy imports and regards Tejas as avoidable. Now, too many MiGs have crashed and IAF is short of numbers so there is renewed interest in this otherwise "na ghar ka na ghat ka" program. While there are many flaws with DRDO, it is also an organization which works in silence and rarely talks about its successes. And it has lost the battle for perception. That is as much a reflection of our TRP culture than any serious look at its problems.
Found on searching..
ReplyDeletehttp://www.drdo.gov.in/drdo/pub/techfocus/2013/TF_April_2013_WEB.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronics_and_Radar_Development_Establishment
http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/bengaluru/article1430489.ece
http://www.sakaaltimes.com/NewsDetails.aspx?NewsId=5437429587628474027&SectionId=5171561142064258099&SectionName=Pune&NewsDate=20130704&NewsTitle=Rs%2020,000%20crore%20business%20generated%20with%20production%20of%20Akash%20missile%20system
Jai
DeleteThanks for your detailed comments giving DRDO side of the story. First let me give you the details about my stint with LRDE; it was in summer of 1966. Also my interaction with a sr. engineer of DRDO happened sometime in 1972-73. As you say, DRDO laboratories must have improved over pathetic state of 1960's and 1970's and that is good news.
However, the main problem with DRDO appears to be non adhering to completion schedules. As you say, there may be many hurdles, but these are faced by every R&D organisation and DRDO must find a way out.
I do not think that DRDO has lost the battle for perception. As an Indian, I am extremely proud of achievements of DRDO and have tried to highlight them in my blog. You can find number of articles here on DRDO successes.
Yet, DRDO's main problems need to be addressed and sooner it is done, better it would be for India, we need you working at your best.
Thanks once again for responding.
Chandrashekhar Athavale