It was
sometime in 2005-06, when one of India's big vehicle manufacturer,
Tata Motors, displayed it's latest creation, a car, at the Auto Expo
exhibition in New Delhi, claiming that this car would be the true
people's car that would be sold under one hundred thousand Rupees. A
2008 study, by Indian rating agency CRISIL, thought the Nano would
expand the nation's car market by 65%. 'NANO' made its debut in 2009
and Tata Motors announced plans to make 2500000 cars every year from
the brand new factory that was coming up. Surprisingly, when the
company started supplying the car, something totally unexpected
happened. In the first year, Tata Motors was not able to sell even
70000 'NANO' cars. This figure progressively came down and in the
year 2013, company barely managed to sell just 12,322 NANO cars.
So,
what exactly went wrong with a car that was considered nothing short
of being revolutionary in its design. I asked to myself. Would have I
bought this car? My frank answer was a definite 'NO.' It was no doubt
technically a very good product, had attractive shape, finish and
also comfortable to sit and drive. Yet, I did not feel associating
myself with something that is called as cheapest. Every car owner
feels in his heart, that his neighbours must envy his car. With NANO,
the reaction would have been the opposite. This has been the exact
psyche of most of the car buyers in India and that is why NANO had no
appeal.
The
launch of the Apple Watch on 9th March 2015, though on
much grander and lavish scale, brings up the same basic question;
would the watch sell like its predecessors from the Apple stable like
iPhone, iPod and iPad? (Apple sold 74.6 million iPhones in just the
last quarter.) Or it would be just another high tech product. Apple
had announced its plans for Apple Watch, last year to much fanfare
and had said that it would begin shipping in April 2015. It is
expected to be Apple’s first new product type since the launch of
iPad in 2010.
There
are already number of players in smart watch sector that includes
South Korean giants Samsung and LG, Japan’s Sony, Motorola,
acquired by Chinese giant Lenovo and finally China’s Huawei. There
are also some startups such as Pebble. Combined worldwide sales
quantities for smart watches are under 5 million.
But
what these smart watches do additionally than keeping time and
telling you the date? Those of readers, who use smart phones, would
know what push notifications are. These are brief text messages that
appear on smart phone screens from the Apps that the user may have in
his smart phone. These notifications inform the user about new mails,
messages, stock quotations and all kind of news; from political to
sports. The main problem with presently available smart watches is
that the watch wearer can not be selective about notifications, as we
can do with a smart phone; they are something of an all-or-nothing
phenomenon: either you get utterly bombarded with notifications or
you get none. Smart phone users can visualize, how irritating it
would be to keep receiving a torrent of notifications on your watch
all the time with a little gong sounding and disturbing you. This is
perhaps the main reason why none of them have really caught on with
insignificant quantities of smart watches sold worldwide in 2014.
Another concern for the user is the battery life, even if it is
rechargeable, when the watch runs so many applications, though Apple promises “All-day” battery that would last about 18 hours of life.It can be charges by snapping a magnetic charger to the back of the watch. (Fantastic innovation!)
Let's
see what is new in Apple Watch. Firstly, it would be integrated with
the iPhone and its software ecosystem, and its range of apps.
Secondly, the watch will have sensors for health and fitness like
monitoring the heart rate, something what now popular health wrist
bands do. It will control music playing on your Apple device or even TV. Apple Watch will present news, health readings and other
notifications in creative ways that can be read at a glance. It will
have a heart rate monitor and accelerometer, and an internal motor
that can signal the wearer with a subtle "tap" on the
wrist. Later, when suitable Apps are developed, it could be used as
a boarding pass, an electronic "key" for hotel doors or even cars. By tapping a finger on the watch face, wearers can send
Instagram photos, sketch and send a dynamic drawing to a friend, and see
who’s calling. Return calls with voice or a voice-to-text messaging
functionality.
Apple
has indicated that the entry price would be $349 in the United
States, and that two different sizes would be available in three
collections, including the “Apple Watch Edition,” featuring
18-karat gold cases in yellow or rose, sapphire crystal and finely
crafted bands and closures. The top model, Apple's high-fashion
"Edition" , made with 18-karat gold, is expected to cost
US $ 17000.
There
is no doubt in anyone's mind that Apple would be able to achieve
massive sales in the initial stage. With its powerful brand, massive
distribution network ( 400 retails stores) and deep pockets for
advertising, some research firms are already predicting first year
sales quantities around 13 to 15 million. But some analysts have
doubts about the watch being a long term success story on three
counts; there is no need for the product, the product is not exciting
and why should anyone pay such high price if Apple keeps on
releasing a new model every year or so -- as it does with smart
phones.
I have
a feeling that this is where the NANO marketing disaster experience
fits in. If Apple advertises its watch on technical issues and basic
features only, I am afraid that it will not be able to change the
game much. In other words, it's low end (below US $ 1000), watches
might sale initially, but the sales could taper off. But if Apple
manages to position its high end watches as a fashion statement, they
may turn to be a game changer. People will grab new models year after
year, without bothering about basic features, only if Apple Watch
can upgrade itself to Longines, Rolexes and Patek Philippes of the
fashion world. The right brand image would be the key and not the
features and the cost.
11th
March 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment